您现在的位置:新闻首页>版权专利

国家版权_外观型专利_知识大全

2021-05-30 22:06沛森版权编辑:mozhe人气:


国家版权_外观型专利_知识大全

M&A at a Glance (February 2015) Publications Mergers & AcquisitionsAriel J. DeckelbaumFrances F. MiJoseph FriedmanSamuel J. WeltRyan D. BlicherDavid C. Rothman Share this See Also Mergers & AcquisitionsAriel J. DeckelbaumFrances F. MiJoseph FriedmanSamuel J. WeltRyan D. BlicherDavid C. Rothman Share this February 13, 2015 Download PDF Following months of almost uninterrupted strength in the M&A market, January 2015 continued December's lackluster performance.  Global volume, as measured by total dollar value, decreased from the previous month to $241.3 billion (a 18.6% decrease).  U.S. volume decreased by 21.3% to $76.1 billion, and the average value of U.S. deals also dropped by 18.6% to $286.2 million, both hitting lows not seen since March 2014.  Bucking the downwards trend, the volume of U.S. strategic transactions increased by 15.5% to $65.1 billion.  Compared to past Januaries, the M&A market in January 2015 was significantly stronger than that in 2013, but slightly less robust than in 2014.  Global volume in January 2015 was 60% higher than in January 2013, but 2.8% lower than in January 2014, and U.S. volume was 19.5% higher than in January 2013 and 52.1% lower than in January 2014.  Utility & Energy was the most active U.S. target industry by volume in January 2015 ($21.2 billion), followed by Healthcare ($12.8 billion) and Forestry & Paper ($10.8 billion).  This is the first time Forestry & Paper has been in the top-five most active U.S. target industries by volume since June 2013, its strong performance due to the $8.2 billion offer for MeadWestvaco Corporation by the Rock-Tenn Company.   Healthcare continues to be the most active industry ($313.8 billion) by a wide margin over the last 12 months.  Figure 2.  January 2015 saw a significant decline in both global and U.S. crossborder transactions: global crossborder transactions declined by 22.7% to $65.8 billion compared to the previous month, while U.S. inbound crossborder transactions declined 38.7% to $16.3 billion over the same period.  Figure 1. With respect to inbound U.S. crossborder transactions, Canada took the top position by deal volume ($8.8 billion) and number of deals (36) in January 2015.  The United Kingdom maintained its top position for outbound U.S. crossborder transactions with $2.1 billion in volume.  Figure 3.  The largest U.S. public merger in January 2015 was the $11.05 billion offer for Regency Energy Partners LP by Energy Transfer Partners, L.P.  Figure 5. Average reverse break fees decreased to 3.7% in January 2015, compared to 4.9% over the last 12 months.  Figure 7.  The percentage of U.S. mergers using cash as the only consideration fell to 33.3% as compared to 50.7% for the last 12 months.  This decrease was offset primarily by an increase in the percentage of cash election mergers, increasing to 33.3% as compared to 12.8% for the last 12 months.  Figure 9. The incidence of tender offers in January 2015 increased to 33.3%, more than 10% higher than the 12-month average.  Figure 11.  Finally, we note that no U.S. public mergers in January 2015 had a go-shop provision.  Figure 8.

,公民肖像权与隐私权,版权如何申请,天津版权申请,优检一生的专利号,专利号zl是什么意思
(来源:斐恩版权)

  • 凡本网注明"来源:沛森版权的所有作品,版权均属于中沛森版权,转载请必须注明中沛森版权,http://capsedu.cooou.com。违反者本网将追究相关法律责任。
  • 本网转载并注明自其它来源的作品,目的在于传递更多信息,并不代表本网赞同其观点或证实其内容的真实性,不承担此类作品侵权行为的直接责任及连带责任。其他媒体、网站或个人从本网转载时,必须保留本网注明的作品来源,并自负版权等法律责任。
  • 如涉及作品内容、版权等问题,请在作品发表之日起一周内与本网联系,否则视为放弃相关权利。





最新热点

更多>>
外观专利_国家专利号免费查询_怎么处理

外观专利_国家专利号免费查询_怎么处理


返回首页